L'âge d'or de l'industrie américaine : une fonderie d'aluminium en juin 1942.
Paul Craig Roberts est un analyste critique de l'économie américaine et sans doute l'un des plus pessimistes.
Dans cet article, il rappelle quelques faits qui devraient inciter à la réflexion au sujet de l'avenir de cette puissante nation.
La moitié des 98000 emplois perdus par l'économie américaine en mars 2008 relèvent de la production industrielle, alors même que ce secteur ne représente plus qu'une infime partie du marché du travail, à peine 13 643 000 salariés (dont 9,849,000 produisent effectivement des biens, des machines à laver, des avions ou des lingots d'acier).
A titre de comparaison, le gouvernement compte 22 387 000 employés, près du double de la catégorie loisirs, accueil et hôtellerie (13 682 000 emplois). Cela veut dire qu'aux Etats-Unis les serveurs, les réceptionnistes ou les cafetiers sont plus nombreux que les ouvriers.
Est-ce le reflet d'une économie en bonne santé ? Selon Roberts on peut en douter. En 2007, les importations représentent l'équivalent de 17 % du PNB quand la production industrielle en 2006 atteint péniblement 11,7 % du PBN.
Que faut-il en conclure ? En premier lieu, se souvenir de la grande capacité d'adaptation de l'économie américaine. Elle est capable de réagir très vite à une nouvelle donne financière ou monétaire.
En second lieu, il est fort probable que la dégradation du dollar se poursuive, accélérant le décrochage des monnaies qui sont encore appairées à la devise américaine, soulageant ainsi l'euro.
La basse brutale du dollar est-elle une porte de sortie pour l'économie américaine ? Probablement, mais pas à court terme. A titre d'exemple, un éditeur français cherchant à imprimer un beau livre à destination du marché américain a décidé de le produire en Chine. En dépit de la meilleure compétitivité de l'industrie américaine, ses standards de qualité ne sont pas ceux du secteur de l'imprimerie au niveau mondial. Sait-on que l'imprimerie aux Etats-Unis n'a toujours pas adopté les formats de papier que le monde entier utilise depuis plus de trente ans ?
The Fading American Economy
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the US economy lost 98,000 private sector jobs in March, half of which were in manufacturing. Today 13,643,000 Americans are employed in manufacturing, of which 9,849,000 are production workers.
Government employs 22,387,000 Americans, 8,744,000 more than manufacturing. Even the category leisure and hospitality employs 13,682,000 Americans, slightly more than manufacturing. There are as many waitresses and bartenders as production workers.
Wholesale and retail trade employ 21,467,000 Americans. Professional and business services employ 18,036,000 Americans of which 8,368,000 are in administrative and waste services. Education and health services employ 18,699,000 Americans.
Financial activities employ 8,228,000 Americans. The information sector employs 3,010,000. Transportation and warehousing employ 4,532,000. Construction employs 7,338,000, and natural resources, mining and logging employ 751,000. Other services such as repair, laundry, and membership associations employ 5,516,000 Americans.
This is the portrait of the US economy according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. It is an economy in which government is the largest employer. Manufacturing employment comprises just under 10% of total employment and about 12% of private sector employment. Everything else is services, and not particularly high level services.
Is this a portrait of a super economy?
To help answer the question, consider that US imports in 2007 were 17% of US GDP, according to the National Income and Product Account tables provided by the Bureau of Economic Affairs. In contrast, the BEA industry tables show that in 2006 (2007 data not yet available) US manufacturing comprised only 11.7% of US GDP.
If US imports actually exceed total US manufacturing output by 5% of GDP, it does not seem possible that the US can close its massive trade deficit. Even if every item manufactured in the US was exported, the US would still have a large trade deficit.
The NIPA and industry tables from which the percentages come are not calculated identically, and I do not know to what extent differences might exaggerate the differences between the percentages. However, it seems unlikely that mere calculation differences would account for US imports exceeding US manufacturing output.
If the US cannot close its trade deficit, it is unlikely that the US dollar can remain the world reserve currency. If the dollar were to lose the reserve currency role, the US government would not be able to finance its annual red ink budget by borrowing from foreigners, as the US saving rate is about zero, and the US would not be able to pay its import bill in its own currency. The rest of the world continues to hold depreciating US currency, because the dollar is the world reserve currency. The dollar is certainly not a good investment having declined dramatically against other traded currencies.
From March 2007 to March 2008 the US economy created 1.5 million new jobs (in services). Legal and illegal immigration and work visas for foreigners exceed US job creation.
During the current school year, 3.3 million high school students are expected to graduate. If we assume that half will go on to college, that leaves 1.6 million entering the work force. College enrollment in 2007 totaled 18 million. If we assume 20% graduate, that makes another 3.6 million job seekers for a total of 5.2 million. Clearly, immigration, work visas, and high school and college graduates exceed the 1.5 million jobs created by the economy. Unless retirements opened up enough jobs for graduates, the unemployment rate has to rise.
The US unemployment rate is creeping up, and according to John Williams, the official unemployment rate greatly understates the real rate of unemployment. Williams has followed the changes that government has made to the official indices over the years in order to spin a more politically palatable picture. Williams uses the original methodology prior to the decades of spin. The original way of measuring unemployment indicates the current rate of unemployment in the US to be 13%, much higher than the 5.1% official number.
Williams also calculates the CPI according to the same way it was officially calculated prior to the recent decades of spin. Williams estimates the current CPI at 12%, three times higher than the official 4% figure.
Williams reports that upward growth biases built into GDP modeling since the early 1980s "have rendered this important series nearly worthless as an indicator of economic activity." Williams estimates that US GDP growth has been in negative territory during almost all of the 21st century. The notion that the US is just now entering a recession is nonsense if we have in fact been in recession for most of the 21st century.
America's post-World War II economic dominance was based on the destruction of other economies by war and socialism. It is a different world now, and Americans have given little thought to the economic challenges of the 21st century.
Paul Craig Roberts était le ministre aux Finances adjoint sous le président Reagan. Il a contribué à diriger les pages d'opinion du Wall Street Journal et de la National Review. Il a cosigné The Tyranny of Good Intentions. On peut lui écrire à PaulCraigRoberts@yahoo.com
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire