Cet article de Claire Berlinski, publié dans les colonnes du City Journal, est un des plus dérangeants que j'ai lus depuis longtemps.
L'auteur commence par une remarque de bon sens. Le moindre document inédit des archives allemandes durant la période national-socialiste est accueilli par un intérêt universel.
En revanche, personne ne s'intéresse aux documents extraits des archives soviétiques en dehors de points d'histoire très particuliers, comme les massacres de Katyn pour la Pologne ou encore ceux de Paracuellos pour l'Espagne.
Cette absence de curiosité, ce refus de savoir, pose de graves questions sur le sens moral de notre société.
Pourquoi sommes-nous si désireux d'extirper la moindre trace de national-socialisme dans notre société alors que nous refusons de faire de même avec le marxisme soviétique qui a pourtant commis des crimes terribles et sur une période plus longue encore ?
Un article qui devrait encourager des vocations d'historien et de chasseur de criminels.
Alors que les derniers nazis ont un pied dans la tombe, les traîtres stipendiés par l'Union soviétique ou les compagnons de route du soviétisme sont toujours là et encore à des postes de pouvoir.
Pourquoi des hommes comme Kenneth Coates, Francisco Fernández Ordóñez, François Mitterrand, Neil Kinnock, Stuart Holland, Catherine Ashton ou encore Joseph Biden s'en tirent à si bon compte ?
Quand on voit comment Edouard Leclerc a été la cible d'un article le mettant en cause pour ce qu'il aurait fait à 16 ans pendant l'Occupation, on reste songeur.
A Hidden History of Evil Why doesn’t anyone care about the unread Soviet archives? Though Mikhail Gorbachev is lionized in the West, the untranslated archives suggest a much darker figure.
In the world’s collective consciousness, the word “Nazi” is synonymous with evil. It is widely understood that the Nazis’ ideology—nationalism, anti-Semitism, the autarkic ethnic state, the Führer principle—led directly to the furnaces of Auschwitz. It is not nearly as well understood that Communism led just as inexorably, everywhere on the globe where it was applied, to starvation, torture, and slave-labor camps. Nor is it widely acknowledged that Communism was responsible for the deaths of some 150 million human beings during the twentieth century. The world remains inexplicably indifferent and uncurious about the deadliest ideology in history.
For evidence of this indifference, consider the unread Soviet archives. Pavel Stroilov, a Russian exile in London, has on his computer 50,000 unpublished, untranslated, top-secret Kremlin documents, mostly dating from the close of the Cold War. He stole them in 2003 and fled Russia. Within living memory, they would have been worth millions to the CIA; they surely tell a story about Communism and its collapse that the world needs to know. Yet he can’t get anyone to house them in a reputable library, publish them, or fund their translation. In fact, he can’t get anyone to take much interest in them at all.
Then there’s Soviet dissident Vladimir Bukovsky, who once spent 12 years in the USSR’s prisons, labor camps, and psikhushkas—political psychiatric hospitals—after being convicted of copying anti-Soviet literature. He, too, possesses a massive collection of stolen and smuggled papers from the archives of the Central Committee of the Communist Party, which, as he writes, “contain the beginnings and the ends of all the tragedies of our bloodstained century.” These documents are available online at bukovsky-archives.net, but most are not translated. They are unorganized; there are no summaries; there is no search or index function. “I offer them free of charge to the most influential newspapers and journals in the world, but nobody wants to print them,” Bukovsky writes. “Editors shrug indifferently: So what? Who cares?”
The originals of most of Stroilov’s documents remain in the Kremlin archives, where, like most of the Soviet Union’s top-secret documents from the post-Stalin era, they remain classified. They include, Stroilov says, transcripts of nearly every conversation between Gorbachev and his foreign counterparts—hundreds of them, a near-complete diplomatic record of the era, available nowhere else. There are notes from the Politburo taken by Georgy Shakhnazarov, an aide of Gorbachev’s, and by Politburo member Vadim Medvedev. There is the diary of Anatoly Chernyaev—Gorbachev’s principal aide and deputy chief of the body formerly known as the Comintern—which dates from 1972 to the collapse of the regime. There are reports, dating from the 1960s, by Vadim Zagladin, deputy chief of the Central Committee’s International Department until 1987 and then Gorbachev’s advisor until 1991. Zagladin was both envoy and spy, charged with gathering secrets, spreading disinformation, and advancing Soviet influence.
When Gorbachev and his aides were ousted from the Kremlin, they took unauthorized copies of these documents with them. The documents were scanned and stored in the archives of the Gorbachev Foundation, one of the first independent think tanks in modern Russia, where a handful of friendly and vetted researchers were given limited access to them. Then, in 1999, the foundation opened a small part of the archive to independent researchers, including Stroilov. The key parts of the collection remained restricted; documents could be copied only with the written permission of the author, and Gorbachev refused to authorize any copies whatsoever. But there was a flaw in the foundation’s security, Stroilov explained to me. When things went wrong with the computers, as often they did, he was able to watch the network administrator typing the password that gave access to the foundation’s network. Slowly and secretly, Stroilov copied the archive and sent it to secure locations around the world.
When I first heard about Stroilov’s documents, I wondered if they were forgeries. But in 2006, having assessed the documents with the cooperation of prominent Soviet dissidents and Cold War spies, British judges concluded that Stroilov was credible and granted his asylum request. The Gorbachev Foundation itself has since acknowledged the documents’ authenticity.
Bukovsky’s story is similar. In 1992, President Boris Yeltsin’s government invited him to testify at the Constitutional Court of Russia in a case concerning the constitutionality of the Communist Party. The Russian State Archives granted Bukovsky access to its documents to prepare his testimony. Using a handheld scanner, he copied thousands of documents and smuggled them to the West.
The Russian state cannot sue Stroilov or Bukovsky for breach of copyright, since the material was created by the Communist Party and the Soviet Union, neither of which now exists. Had he remained in Russia, however, Stroilov believes that he could have been prosecuted for disclosure of state secrets or treason. The military historian Igor Sutyagin is now serving 15 years in a hard-labor camp for the crime of collecting newspaper clippings and other open-source materials and sending them to a British consulting firm. The danger that Stroilov and Bukovsky faced was real and grave; they both assumed, one imagines, that the world would take notice of what they had risked so much to acquire.
Stroilov claims that his documents “tell a completely new story about the end of the Cold War. The Ωcommonly accepted≈ version of history of that period consists of myths almost entirely. These documents are capable of ruining each of those myths.” Is this so? I couldn’t say. I don’t read Russian. Of Stroilov’s documents, I have seen only the few that have been translated into English. Certainly, they shouldn’t be taken at face value; they were, after all, written by Communists. But the possibility that Stroilov is right should surely compel keen curiosity.
For instance, the documents cast Gorbachev in a far darker light than the one in which he is generally regarded. In one document, he laughs with the Politburo about the USSR’s downing of Korean Airlines flight 007 in 1983—a crime that was not only monstrous but brought the world very near to nuclear Armageddon. These minutes from a Politburo meeting on October 4, 1989, are similarly disturbing:
Lukyanov reports that the real number of casualties on Tiananmen Square was 3,000.
Gorbachev: We must be realists. They, like us, have to defend themselves. Three thousands . . . So what?
And a transcript of Gorbachev’s conversation with Hans-Jochen Vogel, the leader of West Germany’s Social Democratic Party, shows Gorbachev defending Soviet troops’ April 9, 1989, massacre of peaceful protesters in Tbilisi.
Stroilov’s documents also contain transcripts of Gorbachev’s discussions with many Middle Eastern leaders. These suggest interesting connections between Soviet policy and contemporary trends in Russian foreign policy. Here is a fragment from a conversation reported to have taken place with Syrian president Hafez al-Assad on April 28, 1990:
H. ASSAD. To put pressure on Israel, Baghdad would need to get closer to Damascus, because Iraq has no common borders with Israel. . . .
M. S. GORBACHEV. I think so, too. . . .
H. ASSAD. Israel’s approach is different, because the Judaic religion itself states: the land of Israel spreads from Nile to Euphrates and its return is a divine predestination.
M. S. GORBACHEV. But this is racism, combined with Messianism!
H. ASSAD. This is the most dangerous form of racism.
One doesn’t need to be a fantasist to wonder whether these discussions might be relevant to our understanding of contemporary Russian policy in a region of some enduring strategic significance.
There are other ways in which the story that Stroilov’s and Bukovsky’s papers tell isn’t over. They suggest, for example, that the architects of the European integration project, as well as many of today’s senior leaders in the European Union, were far too close to the USSR for comfort. This raises important questions about the nature of contemporary Europe—questions that might be asked when Americans consider Europe as a model for social policy, or when they seek European diplomatic cooperation on key issues of national security.
According to Zagladin’s reports, for example, Kenneth Coates, who from 1989 to 1998 was a British member of the European Parliament, approached Zagladin on January 9, 1990, to discuss what amounted to a gradual merger of the European Parliament and the Supreme Soviet. Coates, says Zagladin, explained that “creating an infrastructure of cooperation between the two parliament[s] would help . . . to isolate the rightists in the European Parliament (and in Europe), those who are interested in the USSR’s collapse.” Coates served as chair of the European Parliament’s Subcommittee on Human Rights from 1992 to 1994. How did it come to pass that Europe was taking advice about human rights from a man who had apparently wished to “isolate” those interested in the USSR’s collapse and sought to extend Soviet influence in Europe?
Or consider a report on Francisco Fernández Ordóñez, who led Spain’s integration into the European Community as its foreign minister. On March 3, 1989, according to these documents, he explained to Gorbachev that “the success of perestroika means only one thing—the success of the socialist revolution in contemporary conditions. And that is exactly what the reactionaries don’t accept.” Eighteen months later, Ordóñez told Gorbachev: “I feel intellectual disgust when I have to read, for example, passages in the documents of ΩG7≈ where the problems of democracy, freedom of human personality and ideology of market economy are set on the same level. As a socialist, I cannot accept such an equation.” Perhaps most shockingly, the Eastern European press has reported that Stroilov’s documents suggest that François Mitterrand was maneuvering with Gorbachev to ensure that Germany would unite as a neutral, socialist entity under a Franco-Soviet condominium.
Zagladin’s records also note that the former leader of the British Labour Party, Neil Kinnock, approached Gorbachev—unauthorized, while Kinnock was leader of the opposition—through a secret envoy to discuss the possibility of halting the United Kingdom’s Trident nuclear-missile program. The minutes of the meeting between Gorbachev and the envoy, MP Stuart Holland, read as follows:
In [Holland’s] opinion, Soviet Union should be very interested in liquidation of “Tridents” because, apart from other things, the West—meaning the US, Britain and France—would have a serious advantage over the Soviet Union after the completion of START treaty. That advantage will need to be eliminated. . . . At the same time Holland noted that, of course, we can seriously think about realisation of that idea only if the Labour comes to power. He said Thatcher . . . would never agree to any reduction of nuclear armaments.
Kinnock was vice president of the European Commission from 1999 to 2004, and his wife, Glenys, is now Britain’s minister for Europe. Gerard Batten, a member of the UK Independence Party, has noted the significance of the episode. “If the report given to Mr. Gorbachev is true, it means that Lord Kinnock approached one of Britain’s enemies in order to seek approval regarding his party’s defense policy and, had he been elected, Britain’s defense policy,” Batten said to the European Parliament in 2009. “If this report is true, then Lord Kinnock would be guilty of treason.”
Similarly, Baroness Catherine Ashton, who is now the European Union’s foreign minister, was treasurer of Britain’s Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament from 1980 to 1982. The papers offer evidence that this organization received “unidentified income” from the Soviet Union in the 1980s. Stroilov’s papers suggest as well that the government of the current Spanish EU commissioner for economic and monetary affairs, Joaquín Almunia, enthusiastically supported the Soviet project of gradually unifying Germany and Europe into a socialist “common European home” and strongly opposed the independence of the Baltic states and then of Ukraine.
Perhaps it doesn’t surprise you to read that prominent European politicians held these views. But why doesn’t it? It is impossible to imagine that figures who had enjoyed such close ties to the Nazi Party—or, for that matter, to the Ku Klux Klan or to South Africa’s apartheid regime—would enjoy top positions in Europe today. The rules are different, apparently, for Communist fellow travelers. “We now have the EU unelected socialist party running Europe,” Stroilov said to me. “Bet the KGB can’t believe it.”
And what of Zagladin’s description of his dealings with our own current vice president in 1979?
Unofficially, [Senator Joseph] Biden and [Senator Richard] Lugar said that, in the end of the day, they were not so much concerned with having a problem of this or that citizen solved as with showing to the American public that they do care for “human rights.” . . . In other words, the collocutors directly admitted that what is happening is a kind of a show, that they absolutely do not care for the fate of most so-called dissidents.
Remarkably, the world has shown little interest in the unread Soviet archives. That paragraph about Biden is a good example. Stroilov and Bukovsky coauthored a piece about it for the online magazine FrontPage on October 10, 2008; it passed without remark. Americans considered the episode so uninteresting that even Biden’s political opponents didn’t try to turn it into political capital. Imagine, if you can, what it must feel like to have spent the prime of your life in a Soviet psychiatric hospital, to know that Joe Biden is now vice president of the United States, and to know that no one gives a damn.
Bukovsky’s book about the story that these documents tell, Jugement à Moscou, has been published in French, Russian, and a few other Slavic languages, but not in English. Random House bought the manuscript and, in Bukovsky’s words, tried “to force me to rewrite the whole book from the liberal left political perspective.” Bukovsky replied that “due to certain peculiarities of my biography I am allergic to political censorship.” The contract was canceled, the book was never published in English, and no other publisher has shown interest in it. Neither has anyone wanted to publish EUSSR, a pamphlet by Stroilov and Bukovsky about the Soviet roots of European integration. In 2004, a very small British publisher did print an abbreviated version of the pamphlet; it, too, passed unnoticed.
Stroilov has a long list of complaints about journalists who have initially shown interest in the documents, only to tell him later that their editors have declared the story insignificant. In advance of Gorbachev’s visit to Germany for the celebration of the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, Stroilov says, he offered the German press the documents depicting Gorbachev unflatteringly. There were no takers. In France, news about the documents showing Mitterrand’s and Gorbachev’s plans to turn Germany into a dependent socialist state prompted a few murmurs of curiosity, nothing more. Bukovsky’s vast collection about Soviet sponsorship of terrorism, Palestinian and otherwise, remains largely unpublished.
Stroilov says that he and Bukovsky approached Jonathan Brent of Yale University Press, which is leading a publishing project on the history of the Cold War. He claims that initially Brent was enthusiastic and asked him to write a book, based on the documents, about the first Gulf War. Stroilov says that he wrote the first six chapters, sent them off, and never heard from Brent again, despite sending him e-mail after e-mail. “I can only speculate what so much frightened him in that book,” Stroilov wrote to me.
I’ve also asked Brent and received no reply. This doesn’t mean anything; people are busy. I am less inclined to believe in complex attempts to suppress the truth than I am in indifference and preoccupation with other things. Stroilov sees in these events “a kind of a taboo, the vague common understanding in the Establishment that it is better to let sleeping dogs lie, not to throw stones in a house of glass, and not to mention a rope in the house of a hanged man.” I suspect it is something even more disturbing: no one much cares.
“I know the time will come,” Stroilov says, “when the world has to look at those documents very carefully. We just cannot escape this. We have no way forward until we face the truth about what happened to us in the twentieth century. Even now, no matter how hard we try to ignore history, all these questions come back to us time and again.”
The questions come back time and again, it is true, but few remember that they have been asked before, and few remember what the answer looked like. No one talks much about the victims of Communism. No one erects memorials to the throngs of people murdered by the Soviet state. (In his widely ignored book, A Century of Violence in Soviet Russia, Alexander Yakovlev, the architect of perestroika under Gorbachev, puts the number at 30 to 35 million.)
Indeed, many still subscribe to the essential tenets of Communist ideology. Politicians, academics, students, even the occasional autodidact taxi driver still stand opposed to private property. Many remain enthralled by schemes for central economic planning. Stalin, according to polls, is one of Russia’s most popular historical figures. No small number of young people in Istanbul, where I live, proudly describe themselves as Communists; I have met such people around the world, from Seattle to Calcutta.
We rightly insisted upon total denazification; we rightly excoriate those who now attempt to revive the Nazis’ ideology. But the world exhibits a perilous failure to acknowledge the monstrous history of Communism. These documents should be translated. They should be housed in a reputable library, properly cataloged, and carefully assessed by scholars. Above all, they should be well-known to a public that seems to have forgotten what the Soviet Union was really about. If they contain what Stroilov and Bukovsky say—and all the evidence I’ve seen suggests that they do—this is the obligation of anyone who gives a damn about history, foreign policy, and the scores of millions dead.
Claire Berlinski, a contributing editor of City Journal, is an American journalist who lives in Istanbul. She is the author of There Is No Alternative: Why Margaret Thatcher Matters.
Hmm it seems like your site ate my first comment
(it was super long) so I guess I'll just sum it up what I submitted and say, I'm thoroughly enjoying your blog.
I as well am an aspiring blog writer but I'm still new to everything. Do you have any helpful hints for rookie blog writers? I'd genuinely
Also visit my web site: Abercrombie Bruxelles
Howdy just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The words in your
content seem to be running off the screen in Firefox.
I'm not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with web browser compatibility but I thought I'd post to
let you know. The design look great though! Hope you get the problem resolved soon.
my web-site; Converse Pas Cher
I used to be able to find good information from your articles.
Also visit my blog Evgeni Malkin Authentic Jersey
Thanks for finally writing about > "Pourquoi les archives sovi�tiques n'int�ressent-elles personne ?" < Liked it!
Also visit my web-site: Louis
Appreciate this post. Let me try it out.
Also visit my blog :: Borse Gucci Ufficiale
Exceptional post but I was wondering if you could write a litte more on this
topic? I'd be very thankful if you could elaborate a little bit further. Cheers!
Feel free to surf to my blog post ... Louis Vuitton Bags
Hello, I desire to subscribe for this blog to obtain most recent updates, therefore where can i do it please help out.
Feel free to visit my website - Home Page
We absolutely love your blog and find many of
your post's to be precisely what I'm looking for.
can you offer guest writers to write content for yourself?
I wouldn't mind publishing a post or elaborating on most of the subjects you write with regards to here. Again, awesome weblog!
My web-site :: Louis Vuitton Outlet Online
I always spent my half an hour to read this weblog's posts all the time along with a cup of coffee.
my homepage - Full Article
My spouse and I stumbled over here from a different web
address and thought I might check things out. I like what I see
so now i am following you. Look forward to going over
your web page again.
Feel free to visit my web-site - Abercrombie Paris
Nice post. I learn something totally new and challenging on
websites I stumbleupon everyday. It will always be helpful to read content from other writers and practice
something from their websites.
Also visit my weblog; Cheap NFL Jerseys
Heya i am for the first time here. I found this board and I find It really helpful
& it helped me out much. I'm hoping to offer one thing again and help others like you aided me.
my web-site; Michael Kors Canada
Hello! Someone in my Myspace group shared this site with
us so I came to take a look. I'm definitely enjoying the information. I'm book-marking and will be tweeting
this to my followers! Outstanding blog and amazing design and style.
My weblog; related site
I believe what you wrote was actually very reasonable.
But, what about this? suppose you composed a catchier title?
I mean, I don't want to tell you how to run your blog, however what if you added a title that grabbed a person's attention?
I mean "Pourquoi les archives sovi�tiques n'int�ressent-elles personne ?" is a little plain.
You might look at Yahoo's home page and see how they create post headlines to grab people to click. You might add a video or a picture or two to grab readers interested about what you've written.
Just my opinion, it could bring your posts a little bit more interesting.
Feel free to surf to my website - Cheap Louis Vuitton Handbags
It's going to be end of mine day, but before ending I am reading this enormous article to increase my experience.
Take a look at my homepage - Sac A Main Louis Vuitton
I usually do not comment, but I glanced through a few responses on "Pourquoi les archives sovi�tiques n'int�ressent-elles personne ?".
I do have a few questions for you if you do not mind.
Is it only me or do a few of these remarks appear like they are coming from brain dead individuals?
:-P And, if you are posting on other online sites, I'd like to follow you. Could you make a list of the complete urls of your social community pages like your Facebook page, twitter feed, or linkedin profile?
Check out my web page ... Air Jordan 2013
Pretty nice post. I simply stumbled upon your blog and wished to say that I've really enjoyed surfing around your weblog posts. After all I will be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write once more soon!
Here is my page: click for source
Right away I am going away to do my breakfast, when having my
breakfast coming yet again to read more news.
My blog post - www.tedxyse.com
If some one wants to be updated with most up-to-date technologies therefore he must be go to see this web page and
be up to date everyday.
My weblog Air Jordan
What's up to every body, it's my first visit of this blog; this blog includes awesome and
in fact fine material designed for readers.
Here is my homepage: Wholesale Jerseys
Appreciation to my father who informed me about this web site, this webpage is in fact remarkable.
Feel free to visit my blog post: Cheap Louis Vuitton Bags
What's Taking place i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I've found It absolutely useful and it has aided me out loads.
I hope to give a contribution & help different customers like its helped me.
my web site - additional info
I do not comment, however after reading through a few of the remarks here "Pourquoi les archives sovi�tiques n'int�ressent-elles personne ?".
I do have a couple of questions for you if you do not mind.
Could it be simply me or do a few of the remarks look like they are left by brain dead
people? :-P And, if you are posting at additional places,
I'd like to follow you. Could you make a list of all of your public pages like your linkedin profile, Facebook page or twitter feed?
Here is my web blog Mulberry UK
Great website. A lot of helpful information here. I'm sending it to a few friends ans also sharing in delicious. And obviously, thanks to your effort!
Also visit my web-site :: Tory Burch Outlet
Whats up very nice website!! Guy .. Beautiful .. Superb .
. I will bookmark your blog and take the feeds additionally?
I'm satisfied to search out so many helpful information here within the post, we'd like develop extra techniques on this regard, thank you for sharing.
. . . . .
My webpage ... click for source
I'm truly enjoying the design and layout of your site. It's a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more pleasant for me to come here
and visit more often. Did you hire out a developer to create your theme?
Also visit my blog :: Chaussure De Foot
Wow, that's what I was searching for, what a information! existing here at this webpage, thanks admin of this website.
Feel free to surf to my site: Bonuses
That is really interesting, You are an excessively professional blogger.
I've joined your rss feed and stay up for in the hunt for more of your excellent post. Also, I've shared your site in
my social networks
Feel free to visit my website - Sac A Main Louis Vuitton
I don't know if it's just me or if perhaps everybody else
encountering issues with your website. It looks like some of
the text in your posts are running off the screen. Can somebody else
please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening to them too?
This could be a issue with my internet browser because I've had this happen before. Cheers
Also visit my web site ... Full Report
WOW just what I was looking for. Came here by searching for
Feel free to surf to my web site ... Recommended Site
Heya i am for the first time here. I found
this board and I to find It really helpful & it helped me out much.
I'm hoping to give one thing back and aid others like you aided me.
Feel free to visit my site This Site **
Heya i am for the first time here. I came across this board and I
find It really useful & it helped me out much.
I hope to give something back and help others like you helped me.
Feel free to surf to my web site - homepage
What i do not realize is actually how you are no longer really much more smartly-favored than you might be now.
You're very intelligent. You understand therefore considerably when it comes to this matter, made me in my opinion imagine it from numerous various angles. Its like women and men don't seem
to be fascinated except it is one thing to accomplish with Girl gaga!
Your own stuffs nice. At all times handle it up!
Here is my blog: Look At This
What i do not understood is in truth how you're no longer actually a lot more smartly-liked than you may be right now. You're very intelligent.
You realize therefore considerably with regards to this subject,
made me personally believe it from so many various angles.
Its like men and women aren't fascinated except it is one thing to accomplish with Lady gaga! Your own stuffs outstanding. Always maintain it up!
Review my web blog: Mulberry Outlet (whatsot.com)
Thank you for the good writeup. It in reality was once a enjoyment
account it. Glance complicated to far delivered agreeable from you!
By the way, how could we communicate?
Stop by my blog: binaural beats
Sweet blog! I found it while browsing on Yahoo News.
Do you have any suggestions on how to get
listed in Yahoo News? I've been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Thanks
Here is my weblog: Cheap Jerseys
Hi, I do think this is an excellent blog. I stumbledupon it ;) I am going to come back once again since I saved as a favorite it.
Money and freedom is the best way to change, may you be rich and continue to help other people.
Check out my site - Louis Vuitton Handbags
Hi there! I could have sworn I've been to this website before but after browsing through some of the post I realized it's new to me.
Anyways, I'm definitely glad I found it and I'll be bookmarking and checking back frequently!
Review my blog: get more info
Wow, wonderful weblog layout! How long have you been blogging
for? you made running a blog glance easy. The full look of your web site is wonderful, as neatly as the content!
Feel free to visit my web page - Wholesale Jerseys
Enregistrer un commentaire