lundi 3 novembre 2008

Barack Obama, la victoire annoncée. Trop annoncée ?

Le New York Times s'est mis en quatre pour le candidat démocrate à la présidentielle américaine, le sénateur Barack Obama. Des enquêtes approfondies sur le moindre défaut imputé aux candidats républicains, à une amnésie générale sur les sujets d'inquiétude concernant le candidat de gauche, les journalistes de ce quotidien n'ont ménagé aucun effort pour la victoire de leur cause.

Aujourd'hui, il n'est support de presse qui ne nous annonce comme certaine la victoire électorale du sénateur Obama. C'est possible, même si l'avance est plus serrée qu'on ne le dit et que la bataille reste incertaine dans quelques Etats bascule (swing states).

William Kristol.

Il n'en demeure pas moins que William Kristol, « l'éditorialiste de droite du NYT », a publié un texte fort drôle dans lequel il réussit à la fois à renverser la situation en tentant d'expliquer à la gauche américaine que la moins mauvaise des solutions, c'est une victoire de… John McCain !

Hey Liberals, Don’t Worry
Barack Obama will probably win the 2008 presidential election. If he does, we conservatives will greet the news with our usual resolute stoicism or cheerful fatalism. Being conservative means never being too surprised by disappointment.

I’m worried about my compatriots on the left. Michael Powell reports in Saturday’s New York Times that even the possibility of an Obama defeat has driven many liberals into in a state of high anxiety. And then there’s a young woman from Denver who “told her boyfriend that their love life was on hold while she sweated out Mr. Obama’s performance in Colorado.” Well, what if Obama loses Colorado? Or the presidency? As a compassionate conservative, I’m concerned about the well-being of that boyfriend — and of others who might be similarly situated. I feel an obligation to help.

So let me tell liberals why they should be cheerful if McCain happens to win.

1. It would be a victory for an underdog. Liberals are supposed to like underdogs. McCain is a lonely guy standing up against an unprecedentedly well-financed, superorganized, ExxonMobil-like Obama juggernaut. A McCain upset victory would be a classic liberal happy ending.

2. It would be a defeat for the establishment. Obama’s most recent high-profile Republican endorser was D.C. insider Kenneth Duberstein. Liberals should be on the side of hard-working plumbers, not big-shot lobbyists — oops, sorry, big-shot strategic advisers and consultants. And Duberstein said that Colin Powell’s endorsement was “the Good Housekeeping seal of approval on Barack Obama.” Doesn’t that comment embody everything that liberals (and many conservatives, including me) find creepy about smug establishment back-scratching and gatekeeping in America?

3. It would be a victory for the future. With President Bush’s approval rating at about 25 percent, a McCain triumph would mean Americans were making a judgment on two future alternatives, not merely voting on the basis of their resentment at the past performance of George W. Bush. It would mean voters were looking ahead, not back. Liberals should therefore welcome a McCain win as a triumph of hope over fear, of the future over the past.

4. It would be a victory for freedom. Obama supporter Leon Wieseltier of The New Republic writes that “tyrants and génocidaires would sleep less soundly during a McCain presidency.” Liberals should be opposed to tyranny and genocide. Wieseltier also acknowledges that McCain “was splendidly right about the surge, which is not a small thing; and the grudging way Obama treats the reversal in Iraq, when he treats it at all, is disgraceful.” The surge advanced not only our national security but the cause of freedom in the world. Liberals should be votaries of freedom.

5. A McCain victory would be good for liberalism. Look at recent history. Jimmy Carter and a Democratic Congress begat Ronald Reagan. Bill Clinton and a Democratic Congress produced Newt Gingrich. Who knows what would follow a President Obama and a Democratic Congress? Here’s one possibility: President Sarah Palin.

So liberals shouldn’t be too upset at the idea of McCain winning. Could it happen?

It’s possible. What if the polls, for various reasons, are overstating Obama’s support by a couple points? And what if the late deciders break overwhelmingly against Obama, as they did in the Democratic primaries? McCain could then thread the Electoral College needle.

McCain would have to win every state where he now leads or is effectively even in the polls (including North Carolina, Indiana and Missouri). He’d have to take Florida and Ohio, where he’s about four points down but where operatives on the ground give him a pretty good shot. That gets him to 247 of the 270 votes needed.

McCain’s path to victory is then to snatch Pennsylvania (which gets him to 268), and win either Virginia, Colorado, Nevada or New Mexico (states where he trails by about four to seven points) — or New Hampshire, where he’s 10 points behind but twice won dramatic primary victories.

As for Pennsylvania, two recent polls have McCain closing to within four points. Pennsylvania is the state whose small-town residents were famously patronized by Obama as “bitter.” One of Pennsylvania’s Democratic congressmen, John Murtha, recently accused many of his western Pennsylvania constituents of being racist. Perhaps Pennsylvanians will want to send a little message to the Democratic Party. And that could tip the election to McCain.

It’s an inside straight. But I’ve seen gamblers draw them.

If McCain wins, think of this column as a modest contribution to cheering up distraught liberals. If Obama prevails, I’m confident there are some compassionate liberals out there who will do the same for hapless conservatives as they hobble out to the wilderness.

9 commentaires:

Anonyme a dit…

At this time it seems like Drupal is the top blogging platform out there right now.
(from what I've read) Is that what you're using on your blog?

Here is my website :: series

Anonyme a dit…

Hi. I noticed your site title, "Blogger: Aventures de l'histoire" does not
really reflect the content of your web-site. When creating your site title,
do you think it's best to write it for Search engine marketing or for your visitors? This is one thing I've been struggling with because I want great search rankings but at the same time I
want the best quality for my visitors.

My web site: fatherhood

Anonyme a dit…

Surfing around I noticed your site bookmarked as: Blogger: Aventures de l'histoire. Now I am assuming you book-marked it yourself and wanted to ask if social book-marking gets you a lot of targeted visitors? I've been looking at doing some bookmarking for
a few of my sites but wasn't certain if it would generate any positive results. Thank you very much.

my blog post ... motor sports

Anonyme a dit…

I do not know if it's just me or if perhaps everybody else encountering problems with your website. It appears like some of the written text in your posts are running off the screen. Can somebody else please comment and let me know if this is happening to them as well? This might be a issue with my browser because I've had this happen
previously. Cheers

Look at my web blog: traka

Anonyme a dit…

I'm new to building internet sites and I was wondering if having your blog title related to your articles and other content really that vital? I notice your title, "Blogger: Aventures de l'histoire " does appear to be spot on with what your blog is about yet, I prefer to keep my title less content descriptive and based more around site branding. Would you think this is a good idea or bad idea? Any assistance would be greatly valued.

Here is my web blog - reviews

Anonyme a dit…

Hey. I noticed your website title, "Blogger: Aventures de l'histoire" doesn't really reflect the content of your web-site. When composing your website title, do you believe it's best to
write it for Search engine optimisation or for your audience?
This is something I've been struggling with because I want great rankings but at the same time I want the best quality for my website visitors.

Look at my website :: folije

Anonyme a dit…

Wow that was unusual. I just wrote an really long comment but after I clicked
submit my comment didn't appear. Grrrr... well I'm not
writing all that over again. Regardless, just wanted to say
wonderful blog!

Here is my page ... data

Anonyme a dit…

We absolutely love your blog and find many of your post's to be just what I'm looking
for. Would you offer guest writers to write content for yourself?
I wouldn't mind producing a post or elaborating on a lot of the subjects you write regarding here. Again, awesome weblog!

My web blog ... produces

Anonyme a dit…

I'm new to building websites and I was wondering if having your website title relevant to your content really that important? I notice your title, "Blogger: Aventures de l'histoire " does appear to be spot on with what your blog is about but yet, I prefer to keep my title less content descriptive and based more around site branding. Would you think this is a good idea or bad idea? Any kind of assistance would be greatly appreciated.

My website - removing